Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie streaming sites, where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When coping with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is certainly one worker who keeps his very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely man that is quiet. He just walked in very calmly by having an axe and smashed all the machines. There were several customers by them during the time in addition they were terrified,’ he added.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is just a bit more terrifying, due to the fact axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a member of the staff at a betting store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate using the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the 3 certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is associated with the theory that neighboring communities could be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of a handful of candidates whom have recommended that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that might be situated in East Boston, for example.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley stated throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed benefits.’
Based on the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed having a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power on the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six regarding the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii due to the fact future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the recreations book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier activities betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting more chilli slot double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there is huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect because of the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no further head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this present year his workplace had been accused of editing his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.
Originally posted 2020-02-19 06:50:48.